Sustainability
Sustainability: Environmental Impact Data
Quantified environmental benefits of microalgae-based omega-3 production.
Environmental Impact Comparison
| Impact Category | Traditional Fish Oil | Microalgae Omega-3 | Reduction |
|---|---|---|---|
| Carbon Emissions (per kg omega-3) | 12.5 kg CO₂e | 2.4 kg CO₂e | 80.8% |
| Water Usage (per kg omega-3) | 850 liters | 180 liters | 78.8% |
| Land Use | Oceanic fishing zones | Vertical bioreactors (minimal) | 95%+ reduction |
| Marine Ecosystem Impact | Bycatch, overfishing | Zero | 100% |
| Heavy Metal Contamination Risk | Bioaccumulation present | Controlled environment | Eliminated |
| Production Cycle | 3-5 years (fish maturity) | 7-14 days (algae cultivation) | 99% faster |
Data sources: Life Cycle Assessment studies (ISO 14040/14044 standards), peer-reviewed environmental impact research.
Quantified Environmental Benefits
Carbon Footprint
Microalgae cultivation produces 80% less CO₂ equivalent emissions compared to traditional fish oil extraction and processing.
Ocean Protection
Zero impact on marine ecosystems. No fishing, no bycatch, no disruption to ocean food chains.
Water Efficiency
Closed-loop cultivation system recycles water, reducing freshwater consumption by 79% versus conventional methods.
Production Speed
Algae cultivation cycle (7-14 days) is 260 times faster than fish maturation (3-5 years), enabling responsive production.
Fishery Depletion Context
Global Fishing Industry Impact
- Overfishing Rate: 34.2% of global fish stocks are overfished (FAO, 2020)
- Bycatch: Approximately 10% of global catch is discarded bycatch (9.1 million tonnes annually)
- Fish Oil Demand: 1 million tonnes of fish oil produced annually, requiring 4-5 million tonnes of wild fish
- Ecosystem Disruption: Industrial fishing affects 55% of ocean surface area
Microalgae cultivation eliminates dependency on marine capture fisheries. Each kilogram of algal omega-3 prevents the harvest of approximately 4-5 kg of wild fish, directly reducing pressure on ocean ecosystems.
Sustainable Production Lifecycle
Closed-Loop Cultivation System
Cultivation
Photobioreactors using LED lighting and CO₂ capture
Water Recycling
95% water recirculation rate
Extraction
Supercritical CO₂ (reusable, non-toxic)
Biomass Reuse
Residual biomass for animal feed/fertilizer
Packaging & Materials
Sustainable Packaging Standards
- Bottle Material: 100% post-consumer recycled (PCR) plastic or biodegradable alternatives
- Label: FSC-certified paper with soy-based ink
- Shipping: Carbon-neutral shipping options available; recyclable cardboard packaging
- Minimal Design: Reduced packaging volume to decrease transportation emissions
- End-of-Life: All packaging components are recyclable or compostable
Third-Party Verification
Our sustainability claims are verified through independent Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) conducted according to ISO 14040 and ISO 14044 standards. Annual sustainability audits are performed by accredited third-party organizations. Full LCA reports available upon request at sustainability@asmell.com.
Measurable Impact
By choosing plant-based omega-3, each customer prevents approximately 2.5 kg of wild fish harvest annually and reduces carbon emissions by 10.1 kg CO₂e compared to traditional fish oil consumption.
Our commitment: For every 1,000 bottles sold, we document and report the equivalent environmental impact reduction, verified by third-party auditors.
Continuous Improvement
We conduct annual environmental impact assessments and publish sustainability reports. Our goals include achieving carbon-neutral production by 2026 and transitioning to 100% renewable energy for cultivation facilities by 2027.